Ntim Fordjour defends Family Values Bill, says professional care is not a criminal offence
Assin South Member of Parliament Rev. John Ntim Fordjour has pushed back against claims that Ghana’s Human Sexual Rights and Family Values Bill could expose healthcare workers, counsellors and religious leaders to criminal prosecution for providing support services to individuals who identify as LGBTQ+.
According to the lawmaker, public interpretation of the legislation has increasingly strayed from its intended purpose, creating the impression that ordinary professional and pastoral duties could become punishable under the law.
Addressing concerns raised during discussions on Joy FM’s Super Morning Show, Rev. Fordjour maintained that the bill was designed to address activities that promote or encourage LGBTQ+ practices, not the provision of care, treatment or counselling.
“If somebody comes to a church and receives counselling, how is that promoting LGBT? If a doctor treats a patient, how is that promoting LGBT?” he questioned.
The MP explained that the legislation distinguishes between advocacy and professional responsibility, insisting that individuals carrying out legitimate duties within healthcare facilities, religious institutions or other professional settings were never the target of the bill.
He argued that medical practitioners treating patients, lawyers representing clients and religious leaders offering guidance are performing recognised responsibilities that do not constitute promotion or endorsement of any lifestyle.
Rev. Fordjour further contended that some criticisms directed at the legislation have overstated its potential impact, resulting in fears that professionals could face prosecution simply for interacting with or assisting LGBTQ+ persons.
In his view, the focus of the bill remains on activities intended to advance, publicise or campaign for LGBTQ+ practices rather than routine services provided within professional and faith-based environments.
His comments come at a time when debate surrounding the legislation has intensified following Parliament’s passage of the bill on May 29, 2026, after amendments were introduced during the legislative process.
The legislation continues to generate strong reactions across the country, with supporters arguing that it reflects societal values, while opponents have raised concerns about its broader implications.
As discussions continue over the bill’s provisions and next constitutional steps, differing interpretations of what constitutes promotion, advocacy and professional care are expected to remain central to the national conversation.
About The Author
